The SSL for AI —
Patent-Protected Compliance Infrastructure
Every AI system will need a verifiable compliance certificate. Sunaiva is building the cryptographic trust layer that makes that possible — the same playbook Netscape used to create the $50B+ SSL/TLS certificate industry.
$2.61B Today. $7.69B by 2030.
31.3% CAGR — The Fastest-Growing Segment in Tech
doubled from $25.9B in 2025
Source: Research and Markets 2026
37.8% CAGR — Gartner
Palo Alto, Check Point, SentinelOne, F5, Cisco
No Competitor Combines All Four Pillars
Acquired companies had ONE capability. Sunaiva has all four — plus patents that prevent replication.
| CAPABILITY | SUNAIVA | Palo Alto / Protect AI | Check Point / Lakera | SentinelOne / Prompt Security | VeriGate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mandatory AND-Logic (all gates must pass) | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cross-Provider Semantic Validation | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cryptographic Proof Stamps (PQC) | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | Partial* |
| Bidirectional (input + output unified) | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Article 15 "Presumption of Conformity" | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| DORA compliance mapping | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Patent protection | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
*VeriGate uses hardware enclave cryptography — hardware-bound, not logic-gate-bound. No cross-provider validation. No AND-logic enforcement.
Multiple Revenue Streams from Day One
Articles 9, 11, 14 audit. Replaces €20K–€80K consulting. 60-second delivery.
40–120 page Notified Body submission. 75–85% savings vs consulting.
Monthly recertification. Cancellation = visible compliance regression. High retention by design.
CI/CD pipeline hooks, GRC integration (Vanta, Drata), agent-to-agent x402 payments.
3 Patents Filed. 89 Claims.
Combined portfolio creates an interlocking defensive moat across validation methodology, cryptographic signing, and agent verification.
Let's Talk
days to the EU AI Act Article 15 deadline. Every high-risk AI system in Europe will need verifiable compliance. We have the patents, the product, and the timing.